the way back - nervous breakdown and all that

Last week, I had a  cholecystectomy: I'd had a gallstone bothering for years and the easiest thing was to have the gallblader taken out. The NHS were great -as usual- and I am recovering nicely. It means I have a bit of free time on my hands too. And what better way to use this time than to do a bit of navel-gazing blogging! The ideas contained below have been in gestation for quite some time and, to be honest, I just want to get them out of my system, so here goes... Sometimes, in fact a lot of the time for people who suffer from r ejection sensitive dysphoria (RSD) , we become our own worst enemies. We give criticism -direct, or indeed perceived- far too much credence. We see ourselves as being responsible for things that are out of our control or simply not merited; for instance: the way we are mistreated. It has taken me years to come to terms with the fact that I am not to blame for the victimisation and discrimination I have come up against in my career as a teacher and union...

Following my post from  08.03.25 , I got in touch with Ofsted to ask them to clarify a couple of points. The first line of enquiry was: " I was surprised at the judgement given in the report published in February as well as at the delay in its publication. Why did it take so long to be published - is this normal?" I received an email from Ofsted today. They explained that:  " In response to your enquiry, reports are usually published on the Ofsted website within 38 days of inspection.  In some cases this may vary as it depends when the Inspector publishes the report." To be clear, the report was published a full 79 days after the inspection. Obviously, the question remains: why did it take the inspector so long to publish the report? Secondly, I told Ofsted that  I was also puzzled by the mention of the school having faced several challenges. I asked them w hat these unspecified challenges to add more clarity to the report.   They very politely respond...

  2019 – Ofsted #1 And so it came to pass that the head teacher was able to pull the wool over Ofsted’s eyes when our school was first inspected under their leadership in 2019. I guess it helped that we, the staff, wanted what was best for our school; we had put a lot of work to get it to where it was; we had done our best to make it shine. Sure, we didn’t trust the head (we were wise to their narcissism and their potential for ruthlessness had already become very apparent), but we did it for the children, out of professional pride and to uphold the legacy of our previous head. Initially, it came as a shock that our previous head had been thrown under the bus, her legacy lied about by the current head who had portrayed the school as failing. With hindsight, it was to be expected. The inspectors had bought the lie that 1) the culture of the school was not up to scratch; 2) had been turned around under the new leadership. The lack of impact of past leadership  had apparently bee...

My darlings, it's been too long! I'm still here and beginning to live my best life again after a long period in the wilderness.  A lot has happened over the past few months. F rustratingly, I am not in a position to comment on a lot of these recent events but things have truly got a lot better.  One thing I am permitted to share is that  after the best part of two decades  of living in London, we have moved: pastures new for the family. We have waved goodbye to Penge and moved to the East Coast of Kent. The atmosphere and environment couldn't be more different; and just what we needed. The children  miss their friends but have been enjoying  their new schools and are settling in happily. They are making many new friends and love living by the sea in a far less busy environment.  We're  missing a lot of friends too, but people have already been down and dates are in the diary for more visits. Anxiety is still present but not overarching; the positi...

More articles questioning the Multi Academy Trust (MAT) approach that had been so lauded by the Conservatives have been sent to me this past week. They make for very interesting reading for those of us opposed to academisation. Last week the DfE announced the scrapping of the trust capacity fund, trust establishment and growth fund and academy conversion grants. There is talk of legislation to be put into place to make academies follow the national curriculum, and importantly to return to cooperating more closely with councils.   Jack Dyson’s article in SchoolWeek (07.11.24) comments that academy trusts with “top-down management cultures” are under scrutiny, with the new government seeking “to curtail the freedoms of the academies sector.”   This week, Sir Kevin Collins (a non-executive director at the DfE) has voiced his opinion on the flaws of the MAT system. He is concerned about teachers’ well-being and agency. Referring to the growth of a “narrow compliance culture”, he ...

By all accounts, this week has seen positive steps as far as Labour's position on education goes.   Firstly, on employees' welfare, Rachel Reeves’ budget speech included an affirmation that it was “the government’s plans to boost workers’ rights” and that, “our plan will protect working people from unfair dismissal, safeguard them from bullying in the workplace, and improve their access to paternity and maternity leave.”   Bullying, discrimination, harassment, and victimisation are all too common in the workplace. Unfortunately, protection from these for staff in education has been limited. We will have to see how committed the government will be in combatting these hefty issues which have affected so many of our lives, and continue to do so. But it is a powerful statement and we should make sure the government keeps its promises.    Secondly, after (in recent years) taking a fairly non-committal position on academies, it would appear that the new Labour go...